preptest 73, logical reasoning 2, question 18
summary
the essence of tackling parallel flaw questions on the lsat involves identifying the flawed reasoning in the original argument and finding an answer choice that exhibits the same flawed logic.
- parallel flaw questions require understanding the original argument and its flaw before comparing it to the answer choices.
- the flawed reasoning in the provided example is akin to the 'due for a hit' fallacy, where an outcome is expected simply because it has not occurred for a while.
- a correct parallel argument must match the original in terms of conclusion, evidence, and the method of applying this evidence.
- answer choice c is identified as the correct answer because it mirrors the original argument's flawed reasoning and structure.
- incorrect answer choices are eliminated based on mismatches in evidence frequency, conclusion direction, or the stage of completion.
chapters
00:00
understanding parallel flaw questions
01:02
identifying the flaw
01:58
analyzing answer choices
02:45
selecting the correct answer
