preptest 73, logical reasoning 2, question 6
summary
the content provides an in-depth analysis of how to approach evaluate questions on the lsat, focusing on identifying assumptions within an argument by dissecting its components.
- evaluate questions are a mix between strengthen and weaken questions, aiming to find information that could impact the argument's validity.
- to analyze an argument, it's crucial to break it down into its component parts, including the conclusion and the evidence provided.
- the example argument discusses the recommendation of a new drug in addition to an existing one for patients with immune system disorders at risk of osteoporosis.
- the argument assumes no negative factors against taking the new drug alongside the old one, and the task is to identify assumptions by evaluating answer choices.
- answer choice e, asking about the new drug's efficacy when used with other drugs, is highlighted as the correct choice because it directly impacts the argument's validity.
chapters
00:00
understanding evaluate questions
00:38
dissecting the argument
02:08
analyzing answer choices
04:00
identifying the correct answer
