skip to main content

preptest 73, logical reasoning 1, question 17


carl pyrdum
lesson by carl pyrdum
magoosh expert

summary
the essence of tackling parallel reasoning questions on the lsat involves identifying arguments with structurally similar evidence, conclusions, and logical use of evidence to match the original argument presented.
  • parallel reasoning questions require matching the structure of the argument, including the conclusion and evidence.
  • the process involves analyzing the original argument's structure to find a comparable argument among the answer choices.
  • a correct match will have the same kind of conclusion and evidence, used in a similar way.
  • identifying keywords such as 'thus' can help flag the conclusion of the argument.
  • the strategy includes eliminating answer choices that do not match the structural criteria of the original argument.
chapters
00:00
understanding parallel reasoning
00:22
analyzing the original argument
01:19
evaluating answer choices
01:38
identifying the correct match