preptest 73, logical reasoning 1, question 14
summary
the content provides an in-depth analysis of a method of reasoning question from the lsat, focusing on the argumentative exchange between inez and winona regarding the justification for funding space exploration.
- inez argues for the necessity of investing in space exploration, citing its ability to pay for itself through technological advancements.
- winona counters by arguing that if technological advancements are the goal, they should be funded directly rather than through space exploration programs.
- the analysis breaks down each argument, highlighting the importance of understanding both sides to accurately describe winona's response.
- the correct answer choice (e) is identified by accurately capturing winona's stance that the desired outcomes can be achieved without inez's proposed method.
chapters
00:00
understanding the argument structure
00:28
analyzing inez's argument
01:07
dissecting winona's counterargument
01:48
evaluating the answer choices
