summary
the essence of tackling parallel flaw questions on the lsat involves identifying an answer choice that replicates the original argument's logical fallacy.
- parallel flaw questions require matching the flawed reasoning in the answer choices to that of the original argument.
- understanding the original argument's structure and conclusion is crucial for identifying the parallel flaw.
- the tu quoque flaw, highlighting hypocrisy, is a common logical fallacy encountered in these questions.
- analyzing each answer choice methodically to match both the conclusion and the evidence with the original argument is essential.
- the correct answer choice mirrors the original argument's flawed reasoning without introducing unrelated flaws.
chapters
00:00
understanding parallel flaw questions
00:15
dissecting the original argument
01:35
methodical analysis of answer choices
02:52
identifying the correct answer