this is the last lesson of the section
preptest 141 (preptest 73), lr2
summary
the content focuses on tackling necessary assumption questions in the lsat, specifically through dissecting an argument about the benefits of genetically engineered crops over traditional pesticide use.
- necessary assumption questions require identifying an unstated premise critical to the argument's success.
- understanding the argument involves breaking it down into its conclusion and supporting evidence.
- the argument presented concludes that genetically engineered crops are likely to aid wildlife recovery by eliminating the need for harmful pesticides.
- identifying the assumption involves recognizing that the argument assumes no unstated harms or benefits that could negate the proposed advantage of genetically engineered crops.
- the correct answer choice confirms that genetically engineered crops cause less harm than those treated with pesticides, aligning with the argument's underlying assumption.
chapters
00:00
understanding necessary assumptions
00:20
dissecting the argument
01:16
identifying the assumption
02:09
evaluating answer choices