preptest 73, logical reasoning 2, question 22
summary
the content focuses on resolving paradox questions in the lsat, using a specific discrepancy in consumer behavior towards yogurt and milk advertising as an example.
- paradox questions require identifying and resolving apparent discrepancies within the given information.
- the example provided involves a trend where advertising influences yogurt preferences more than milk, yet a supermarket chain sees increased milk sales over yogurt following an advertising campaign.
- the correct answer explains the discrepancy by considering external factors affecting yogurt sales, demonstrating how to approach and solve paradox questions.
- answer choices are analyzed to show common pitfalls in reasoning and how to select the answer that best resolves the paradox.
chapters
00:00
understanding paradox questions
00:34
identifying the paradox
01:24
analyzing answer choices
02:33
resolving the paradox
