preptest 73, logical reasoning 2, question 19
summary
the content provides an in-depth analysis of how to approach necessary assumption questions on the lsat, focusing on identifying assumptions that link the evidence presented in an argument to its conclusion.
- necessary assumption questions require identifying unstated premises that must be true for the argument's conclusion to be valid.
- understanding the argument involves breaking it down into its conclusion and the evidence supporting it.
- the example provided illustrates the process of linking two unconnected concepts in the evidence and conclusion through the correct assumption.
- answer choice analysis demonstrates common pitfalls and the importance of closely aligning the assumption with the argument's specific needs.
- the correct answer connects enabling belief in better futures with preventing loss of motivation, directly addressing the argument's core assumption.
chapters
00:00
understanding necessary assumptions
00:25
breaking down the argument
01:19
identifying the core assumption
01:48
analyzing answer choices
