preptest 73, logical reasoning 2, question 1
summary
the content provides an in-depth analysis of how to approach and solve a 'weaken the argument' question on the lsat, focusing on identifying and attacking the argument's assumptions.
- understanding the argument's conclusion and evidence is crucial for identifying its assumptions.
- the argument's assumptions may include the adequacy of the sample size, absence of bias in sample selection, and representativeness of the sample.
- to weaken an argument, one must find evidence that contradicts these assumptions.
- the correct answer choice will directly challenge one of the argument's unspoken assumptions, thereby undermining its conclusion.
- irrelevant comparisons or information that strengthens the argument are not suitable for weakening the argument.
chapters
00:00
understanding weaken questions
01:01
strategies for attacking assumptions
01:43
evaluating answer choices
