preptest 73, logical reasoning 1, question 15
next lesson
preptest 141 (preptest 73), lr1
summary
the content focuses on identifying and understanding the flaw in an argument, specifically within the context of lsat preparation, using a flaw question as an example.
- understanding the argument's conclusion and evidence is crucial before identifying its error.
- the example provided illustrates a causation versus correlation flaw within an argument about an advertising campaign's effectiveness.
- the correct answer choice highlights the argument's failure to consider external factors that could have influenced the sales figures, demonstrating the causation versus correlation error.
- other answer choices are dismissed by closely analyzing the argument's scope and the specific details it presents, emphasizing the importance of precision in identifying logical flaws.
- the discussion reinforces the significance of distinguishing between causation and correlation, a common source of errors in arguments.
chapters
00:00
identifying the argument's conclusion
01:22
understanding causation vs. correlation
01:52
analyzing answer choices
02:56
selecting the correct answer