skip to main content
home>preptest 73, passage 2, question 11
carl pyrdum
lesson by carl pyrdum
magoosh expert
summary
the content provides an in-depth analysis of an lsat analogy question, focusing on identifying the analogous relationship between a given scenario and the answer choices.
  • the question revolves around understanding the relationship between cameron and her artworks, emphasizing the unintended effects of her creations.
  • the analysis involves comparing this relationship to various scenarios across different disciplines to find a match that mirrors the original relationship's dynamics.
  • answer choice c, a sculptor using ordinary objects to create works with a certain grandeur, is identified as the correct analogy, reflecting the unintended yet positive outcome of cameron's work.
  • other answer choices are systematically eliminated based on their failure to accurately mirror the relationship between cameron's intentions and the outcomes of her art.
  • the explanation highlights the importance of closely examining the specifics of the original scenario and the answer choices to accurately solve analogy questions on the lsat.
chapters
00:00
understanding the original relationship
00:52
analyzing the answer choices
01:38
identifying the correct analogy
02:03
eliminating incorrect options