next lesson
preptest 141 (preptest 73), rc1, passage 2
summary
the content delves into a specific lsat reading comprehension question that focuses on resolving a paradox related to the suspension of disbelief in different mediums.
- identifies the nature of the question as akin to a logical reasoning paradox question, emphasizing the rarity but possible crossover of logical reasoning elements into reading comprehension sections.
- explains the paradox: paintings and theater allow for suspension of disbelief, whereas narrative photographs do not, despite the expectation that they might.
- details the process of elimination through the answer choices, highlighting why each one either exacerbates the paradox or fails to address the core issue.
- concludes that the correct answer explains the paradox by showing how painters can manipulate details to enhance believability, unlike photographs which remain bound to reality.
chapters
00:00
understanding the paradox
00:49
analyzing the discrepancy
01:47
evaluating the answer choices
02:37
identifying the correct answer