june 2007, logical reasoning 2, question 23
next lesson
preptest 123 (june 2007), lr2
summary
the essence of flaw questions on the lsat is to identify errors within an argument by dissecting its conclusion and evidence, using a specific example to illustrate how to approach and solve these questions.
- flaw questions require breaking down the argument into its conclusion and evidence.
- the example provided demonstrates a common flaw: assuming that because something is motivated by selfishness, it must be unreliable.
- identifying the flaw involves understanding that selfish motivations do not necessarily lead to falsehoods.
- the correct answer choice (d) highlights that a promise's reliability is not undermined by the speaker's selfish motivations.
- other answer choices are dismissed by closely analyzing the argument's logic and avoiding extremes or misinterpretations.
chapters
00:00
understanding flaw questions
00:52
identifying the flaw
01:07
analyzing answer choices