skip to main content

june 2007, logical reasoning 2, question 7


carl pyrdum
lesson by carl pyrdum
magoosh expert

summary
the essence of tackling pointed issue questions on the lsat involves identifying a specific disagreement between two perspectives, as illustrated through an analysis of a question about moderation and risk-taking.
  • pointed issue questions require proving a disagreement between two parties based on their stated positions.
  • antonio defines moderation as never deviating from the middle course but highlights the loss of spontaneity and opportunities.
  • marla argues that true moderation involves moderating moderation itself, implying that taking risks is part of living a moderate life.
  • the correct answer (b) is identified by understanding that antonio and marla disagree on what a life of moderation entails regarding risk-taking.
  • other answer choices are dismissed by closely analyzing the specific views and implications of antonio and marla's statements.
chapters
00:00
understanding pointed issue questions
00:21
analyzing perspectives on moderation
01:49
identifying the core disagreement
02:10
evaluating incorrect answer choices