next lesson
preptest 123 (june 2007), lr1
summary
the content focuses on dissecting a strategy of argumentation question, specifically illustrating how to analyze and critique an argument by breaking it down into its conclusion and evidence, using a sample lsat question.
- understanding the argument requires identifying the conclusion and the evidence presented.
- the example provided contrasts the arguments of gamba and munoz regarding a new water system, highlighting the importance of scrutinizing the basis of claims.
- gamba's critique centers on the inadequacy of the voting sample size to represent the city's population's view, challenging munoz's conclusion.
- the correct answer choice (e) is identified by matching gamba's strategy of casting doubt on the conclusion due to an unreliable statistical sample.
- this process exemplifies the method of reasoning questions on the lsat, emphasizing critical thinking and analytical skills.
chapters
00:00
understanding method of reasoning questions
00:17
breaking down the argument
01:15
analyzing answer choices
02:11
identifying the correct answer