june 2007, logical reasoning 1, question 6
summary
the content focuses on dissecting a sufficient assumption question on the lsat, illustrating how to bridge the gap between the conclusion and evidence to find the correct answer.
- identify the conclusion and evidence within the question, noting the gap that exists between them.
- the correct answer to a sufficient assumption question will make the conclusion absolutely true by bridging the identified gap.
- analysis of a sample question involving murray's eligibility for the executive administrator position based on his qualifications and a felony conviction.
- evaluation of answer choices, demonstrating the process of elimination based on the question's requirements and the evidence provided.
- selection of the correct answer that conclusively proves murray's ineligibility for the position, illustrating the application of lsat strategies.
chapters
00:00
understanding sufficient assumption questions
00:32
identifying conclusion and evidence
