june 2007, logical reasoning 1, question 4
summary
the content provides an in-depth analysis of a flaw question on the lsat, focusing on identifying the error in an argument related to ocksenfrey's prepackaged meals' nutritional value.
- a flaw question requires breaking down the argument into conclusion and evidence.
- the conclusion is that ocksenfrey's prepackaged meals are nutritious, challenged by a biased report from connorly.
- the flaw identified is treating the rejection of evidence as proof of the opposite conclusion.
- the correct answer choice (a) treats evidence of bias as evidence that the connorly report's claims are false.
- other answer choices are dismissed for various reasons, highlighting the importance of closely analyzing the argument's structure and evidence.
chapters
00:00
understanding flaw questions
01:14
analyzing the flaw and answer choices
