next lesson
preptest 123 (june 2007), lr1
summary
the essence of tackling parallel flaw questions on the lsat involves identifying an answer choice that mirrors the original argument's structure, evidence, and flaw.
- parallel flaw questions require matching the conclusion and evidence type of the original argument, ensuring they share the same logical flaw.
- the process begins with dissecting the original argument into its conclusion and evidence, identifying the flaw in reasoning.
- a correct parallel argument must have corresponding parts to the original, including similar types of evidence, conclusion, and the same misuse of evidence.
- answer choices are evaluated based on their structural similarity to the original argument, dismissing those that fail to replicate the specific flaw.
- the chosen answer must flawlessly parallel the original argument's reasoning error, as demonstrated in the provided example.
chapters
00:00
understanding parallel flaw questions
00:32
dissecting the original argument
01:30
evaluating answer choices
01:57
identifying the correct answer