{"id":9916,"date":"2017-05-22t20:49:35","date_gmt":"2017-05-23t03:49:35","guid":{"rendered":"\/\/www.catharsisit.com\/hs\/?p=9916"},"modified":"2017-05-22t20:49:35","modified_gmt":"2017-05-23t03:49:35","slug":"plessy-v-ferguson-apush-topics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.catharsisit.com\/hs\/ap\/plessy-v-ferguson-apush-topics\/","title":{"rendered":"plessy v. ferguson: apush topics to study for test day"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
plessy v. ferguson<\/em> apush questions show up frequently on the exam. this is one of those \u201clandmark\u201d supreme court cases that you really need to know. the impact of this decision was huge. it basically defined racial policy in the period between reconstruction and the civil rights movement. read on for everything you need to know about plessy v. ferguson<\/em> for the ap us history exam. <\/p>\n plessy v. ferguson<\/em> is a key supreme court case in u.s. history. it shaped racial policy in the united states for over half a century by upholding the legality of racial segregation. <\/p>\n in 1890, louisiana passed the separate car act, which required separate cars for blacks and whites on railroads. a civil rights activist group decided to test the law. they wanted someone to get arrested on the basis of this law so they could challenge the law in court, hoping to get it overturned. homer plessy was their test case. plessy was a free-born, mixed race man, and though his heritage was \u215e european and only \u215b african, under the law, he was classified as black and would have to ride in a \u201cblack-only\u201d railcar. in 1892, the group got plessy to buy a ticket, seat himself in a white car, and get arrested on purpose. <\/p>\n the case went to trial, first at the state level in a case known then as homer plessy v. state of louisiana<\/em>. plessy\u2019s lawyers argued that the state law failed to protect his rights and was in violation of the 13th and 14th amendments. the judge, john howard ferguson, disagreed, ruling that the state had the right to regulate railroads that operated within state boundaries. plessy was found guilty and charged a fine. <\/p>\n the case was appealed again and again until it finally reached the u.s. supreme court in 1896. <\/p>\n in a 7-1 decision, the supreme court upheld the earlier decision of the lower courts and ruled against plessy. the justices argued that the louisiana law did not violate the 14th amendment, nor did it imply the inferiority of blacks. instead, they said that states had the right to make public policy involving racial segregation, assuming accommodations were \u201cseparate but equal.\u201d <\/p>\n 1896 (the year of the supreme court decision) <\/p>\n plessy v. ferguson<\/em> provided a legal justification for racial segregation. it essentially gave the green light to jim crow. <\/p>\n the impact of this case went well beyond railcars. now that \u201cseparate but equal\u201d was deemed perfectly legal and constitutional, many states went crazy with it, segregating everything from schools and restaurants to water fountains and restrooms and everything in between. also, even though \u201cseparate but equal\u201d was the standard they claimed, this often wasn\u2019t really the case. facilities designated for blacks were often of lower quality than those meant for whites. <\/p>\n these policies remained on the books all the way until the mid-1900s. the \u201cseparate but equal\u201d doctrine remained the law of the land in many places until it was overturned by the supreme court in the 1954 case of brown v. board of education<\/em>. <\/p>\n \u201cthe object of the amendment was undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of the two races before the law, but, in the nature of things, it could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political, equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either. laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation, in places where they are liable to be brought into contact, do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power.\u201d the decision in this supreme court case was used to the correct answer is (d). the court decision ruled that separating the races did not inherently imply the inferiority of either race and did not violate anyone\u2019s rights under the 14th amendment. this was used to justify de jure racial segregation, which took the form of \u201cjim crow\u201d laws. remember, de jure<\/em> means \u201caccording to the law,\u201d so this involved laws that required that the races be segregated. this is opposed to de facto<\/em> (\u201cin practice\u201d) segregation, which is not part of the law but occurs as a result of other socioeconomic factors (e.g., neighborhoods today that are predominantly one race even though anyone can legally live there). <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" plessy v ferguson apush questions show up frequently on the exam. read on for everything you need to know about this landmark supreme court case.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":225,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[240],"tags":[276],"ppma_author":[24937],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nwhat is plessy v. ferguson<\/em>?<\/h2>\n
case background: <\/h3>\n
the decision: <\/h3>\n
important year to note for plessy v. ferguson<\/em>: <\/h2>\n
why is the plessy v. ferguson <\/em>case so important?<\/h2>\n
what are some historical people and events related to plessy v. ferguson<\/em>? <\/h2>\n
\n
what example question about plessy v. ferguson<\/em> might come up on the apush exam?<\/h2>\n
\n-majority opinion, plessy v. ferguson<\/em> (source<\/a>) <\/p>\n
\na) restrict african americans\u2019 ability to exercise their right to vote.
\nb) grant citizenship to african americans, including former slaves.
\nc) forcibly integrate public schools throughout the united states.
\nd) justify de jure racial segregation in the public arena. <\/p>\nanswer: <\/h3>\n