imagine two students. one, whom we\u2019ll call harold, goes to an elite prep academy on the east coast. his days are filled with endless studying since he is enrolled in advanced classes (differential calculus, astrophysics, and shakespeare) and the competition is intense. this year, despite all those 3 a.m. study sessions, he was able to only muster a 3.3 gpa. <\/p>\n
the other student, spencer, is enrolled in a 60-student school in a small town in america. he has always been top of the class and has had plenty of time for engaging extracurricular activities: captain of the baseball team, active in speech and debate, and a ferocious downhill skier come winter. <\/p>\n
who would you choose?<\/strong><\/p>\n if you were the admissions officer at a competitive, whom would you pick? harold or spencer? many of us see the phrase \u201ctop of the class\u201d in spencer\u2019s quick bio and automatically choose him. he\u2019s also a well-rounded and accomplished guy, compared to harold, who seems to study far too much for his own good (psst! and he only got a 3.3).<\/p>\n but let\u2019s see how our perception changes, when i add the following nugget of information:<\/p>\n harold spencer now, all of a sudden, harold seems like a brainiac, whereas spencer seems far more average.<\/p>\n but wait, you protest! why should we even have the sat in the first place? can\u2019t we get all the information we need to know by just looking at gpa and the other information? well, that\u2019s the thing. the exercise above shows that we can\u2019t always rely on gpa, since it differs from school to school, and from region to region. <\/p>\n the sat is important because it gives us a score that applies to everybody. it allows us, in a sense, to compare the apple of an elite public school to the orange of a small town rural school. <\/p>\n now i\u2019m not implying that the admissions doesn\u2019t already take into account such factors as the school you go to\u2014especially if it is an elite one\u2014or the classes you take (it does), but it is still difficult to quantify just what effect these things have. for instance, how would the following piece of information color your perception of the two candidates:<\/p>\n harold spencer it seems that an expensive private school education doesn\u2019t always get you a stellar sat score<\/a>. whereas, a rural, small school education doesn\u2019t always preclude a competitive sat score<\/a>. simply put, an sat score is a useful piece of information. it should not be the only piece of information\u2014and it never is, even at those schools that weigh the most. but it is an important data point, that very few schools choose to ignore. <\/p>\n so however much you might rail against the test, or however many articles you read that decry the sat as unfair, it still serves a useful purpose\u2014to compare students, whether they be from very different walks of life or from the same small town rural school. the sat is important because it gives us a score that applies to everybody. it should not be the only piece of information, but it is an important data point, that very few schools choose to ignore. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[91],"tags":[],"ppma_author":[24882],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
\nsat score: 1580 out of 1600<\/p>\n
\nsat score: 1120 out of 1600<\/p>\n
\nsat score: 1310 out of 1600<\/p>\n
\nsat score: 1300 out of 1600<\/p>\n
\n <\/p>\nthe importance of the sat in a nutshell<\/h2>\n
\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"