{"id":5598,"date":"2016-02-26t10:30:01","date_gmt":"2016-02-26t18:30:01","guid":{"rendered":"\/\/www.catharsisit.com\/hs\/?p=5598"},"modified":"2016-02-25t17:11:27","modified_gmt":"2016-02-26t01:11:27","slug":"when-to-take-the-sat-the-first-mover-advantage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.catharsisit.com\/hs\/sat\/when-to-take-the-sat-the-first-mover-advantage\/","title":{"rendered":"when to take the sat: the first-mover advantage"},"content":{"rendered":"
although much has been written comparing and contrasting the new and old sat, the new sat and the act, and every other conceivable combination, there\u2019s been relatively little discussion of the behind-the-scenes repercussions of having a brand new test.<\/p>\n
by now you know you can expect to see more statistics, less geometry, and literally thousands of more words overall. but what you may not realize is that there are some scoring and logistical implications of taking the new sat.
\n <\/p>\n
let\u2019s focus on the scoring first. the college board has always been secretive about what exactly happens in those 21 days between exam and results-delivery, but we know a few things:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
that last point\u00a0is the one we\u2019ll pay special attention to. how does the college board ensure that my score is not affected by different forms (dates) of the test? they scale it up or down depending on where the average score falls. but how would they do that if they didn\u2019t have a long history of tests to compare the average to?
\n <\/p>\n
that\u2019s exactly the case we find ourselves in, coming into the march 2016 new sat. so to create a benchmark, the college board is going to look to two data sources to scale the march test \u00a0against:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
so how does this affect the march 2016 test-taker? there are indications that he can expect a slight score inflation. when you compare a score of a prepared test taker to the scores of people who took the test (as an experimental section) completely unprepared, your score should look stronger. i would not expect to see 800s in place of 600s, but in a time where admissions decisions can come down to tens of points on sats, every little bit counts.<\/p>\n
furthermore, when the college board last introduced a new sat, in 2005, the first year\u2019s scores were the highest on record. the average score declined steadily every year after. this corroborates the theory that scaling takes time, and that the variance is usually positive for the early-adopters.<\/p>\n
hopefully this new perspective puts a spring in your step, and lets you enter your testing facility with confidence instead of worry. you’ll do great!
\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
although much has been written comparing and contrasting the new and old sat, the new sat and the act, and every other conceivable combination, there\u2019s been relatively little discussion of the behind-the-scenes repercussions of having a brand new test.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":156,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[91],"tags":[36,167,29,62],"ppma_author":[24917],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n