{"id":12359,"date":"2018-06-14t11:00:39","date_gmt":"2018-06-14t18:00:39","guid":{"rendered":"\/\/www.catharsisit.com\/hs\/?p=12359"},"modified":"2018-03-21t20:20:37","modified_gmt":"2018-03-22t03:20:37","slug":"apush-themes-party-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.catharsisit.com\/hs\/ap\/apush-themes-party-politics\/","title":{"rendered":"themes across apush: party politics"},"content":{"rendered":"
the focus of this blog post will be for you to practice the skill of identifying changes and continuities<\/a> throughout apush with one theme in mind: party politics<\/strong>. <\/p>\n we know that getting all the details about what happened in u.s. history (let alone explaining the significance of those events) can be hard. that\u2019s why we have created this series of posts that gives you a brief overview of one theme at a time, along with tips to help you think about patterns of change and continuity. ready to dive in? let\u2019s go! <\/p>\n before we dive into the theme for this post, it\u2019s important for me to point out two things.<\/p>\n now that we have gotten those two things out of the way, let me try to orient you to what this blog post will be doing. in order to look at the development of political parties in the united states as a historical phenomenon, we will be examining three historical periods.<\/p>\n the astute student (which i am sure you are!) likely noticed that there are several events missing; in any survey of history, there likely will be!<\/p>\n however, i want you to think about how the four themes above might change if i chose different events to highlight for the development of political parties. furthermore, as always, keep a close eye on multiple themes that might be important in the events that i do<\/em> highlight. <\/p>\n if you\u2019ve read any of the federalist papers, you likely know that there were a lot of conflicting opinions about how to run the country once the united states actually became a country. this sentiment is, perhaps, best articulated by james madison in federalist 10<\/a>. here, he writes:<\/p>\n madison goes on to explain that the goal of a country is to control factions where they exist. eliminating them altogether would require tyranny and, even then, human nature would bend people towards factioning off.<\/p>\n and how did madison propose controlling the effects of factions? see if you can parse it out here:<\/p>\n essentially, madison is saying that the only way to protect against an overwhelming majority faction to stomp on the rights of the minority factions is to have so many options to choose from that no one faction gains too much power. this is totally in line with a classical liberal ideology<\/a>, and it\u2019s totally not what we have today. so what gives?<\/p>\n well, political parties are really good at organizing people and, in a republic where individuals vote on their representatives, organizing people is key to gaining political power. perhaps no one knew that better than our seventh president, andrew jackson. <\/p>\n the era of jacksonian democracy would dramatically change the political landscape in america. how? three words: expand. the. base.<\/strong> <\/p>\n andrew jackson\u2019s election to president in 1828 would give him the title (often debated) of \u201cthe people\u2019s president.\u201d and it\u2019s easy to see why that happened. let\u2019s examine the changing voter qualifications in one state: new jersey.<\/p>\na brief overview of political parties <\/h3>\n
\n
\n
apush themes: party politics<\/h3>\n
1. the early republic<\/h4>\n
\nportrait of james madison, writer of the federalist 10 (source<\/a>)<\/center><\/p>\n“among the numerous advantages promised by a well-constructed union, none deserves to be more accurately developed than its tendency to break and control the violence of faction\u2026by a faction, i understand a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adversed to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community. there are two methods of curing the mischiefs of faction: the one, by removing its causes; the other, by controlling its effects.”<\/ul>\n
\u201cthe smaller the society, the fewer probably will be the distinct parties and interests composing it; the fewer the distinct parties and interests, the more frequently will a majority be found of the same party; and the smaller the number of individuals composing a majority, and the smaller the compass within which they are placed, the more easily will they concert and execute their plans of oppression. extend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties and interests; you make it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens…”<\/ul>\n
2. the age of jacksonian democracy<\/h4>\n