{"id":10578,"date":"2017-08-03t18:35:21","date_gmt":"2017-08-04t01:35:21","guid":{"rendered":"\/\/www.catharsisit.com\/hs\/?p=10578"},"modified":"2022-06-14t18:35:21","modified_gmt":"2022-06-15t01:35:21","slug":"new-south-apush-topics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.catharsisit.com\/hs\/ap\/new-south-apush-topics\/","title":{"rendered":"the new south: apush topics to master before test day"},"content":{"rendered":"
although the success of the ideology is questioned by historians, the idea of \u201cthe new south\u201d was a way that southerners made sense of their defeat and their new place within the united states after the civil war. but just how new was the new south? and what were the goals of this ideology? keep reading to find out more about this important topic on the apush exam. <\/p>\n
henry grady, an atlanta journalist, is credited with coining the term \u201cthe new south\u201d in his editorials. instead of building a society that had at its foundation slavery and agriculture, <\/p>\n
\u201cthe new south presents a perfect democracy…a social system compact and closely knitted, less splendid on the surface, but stronger at the core; a hundred farms for every plantation, fifty homes for every palace; and a diversified industry that meets the complex needs of this complex age\u201d (grady, \u201cthe new south\u201d<\/a>). <\/p><\/blockquote>\n
from this quote, it\u2019s clear that grady was responding to an idea that was popular at the time: the confederacy lost the civil war because it was too agrarian, too economically polarized (among whites), too old. the new south would rectify these problems, grady believed (even though many historians debate the extent to which these were the actual problems of the confederacy; i\u2019ll speak more on that later). <\/p>\n
it may be most helpful to contrast the new south to the \u201cold south.\u201d as will become apparent as you continue reading this post, the distinctions between new and old may have been more of a marketing ploy or a rallying cry than substantive shifts in the political or economic realms of the former confederacy. <\/p>\n