{"id":10528,"date":"2017-11-03t10:00:50","date_gmt":"2017-11-03t17:00:50","guid":{"rendered":"\/\/www.catharsisit.com\/hs\/?p=10528"},"modified":"2017-10-28t16:46:45","modified_gmt":"2017-10-28t23:46:45","slug":"yalta-conference-apush-topics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.catharsisit.com\/hs\/ap\/yalta-conference-apush-topics\/","title":{"rendered":"yalta conference: apush topics to study for test day"},"content":{"rendered":"
the yalta conference of 1945 had huge implications for the post-wwii world. this meeting of the big three – winston churchill, fdr, and stalin \u2013 would be what many historians came to consider the beginning of cold war<\/a> tensions. keep reading for an overview of important yalta conference apush concepts to study for the exam.<\/p>\n let me lay out the context before we get into what the actual yalta conference was all about. if you need an overview of world war ii more broadly, please reference the pbs documentary the war<\/em><\/a>, or any other resource you may have on the second world war.<\/p>\n as the war continued into 1945, the momentum shifted to the allies (great britain, the united states, and the soviet union) after the battle of the bulge<\/a> (december 1944-january 1945). as a result of not being able to break allied lines, german forces lacked any real resources to mount another offensive. it is within this context that the yalta conference took place, in the resort town of yalta on the black sea in early february of 1945. <\/p>\n churchill (great britain), fdr (us), and stalin (ussr) met here to discuss the terms of surrender for the german forces, and to create a strategy for the pacific theater of the war.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n the biggest takeaways from the yalta conference are as follows:<\/p>\n i\u2019m so glad you asked. <\/p>\n as you well may know, the united states and the soviet union were allies during wwii; most historians would call that partnership one of convenience. have you ever heard the phrase \u201cthe enemy of my enemy is my friend\u201d? well, that basically describes the mood at yalta. the united states and great britain weren\u2019t chummy with stalin and the ussr, but they knew that if they were to have any hope of winning the war, they would have to cooperate with the soviet union. <\/p>\n so the yalta conference was an act of cooperation; until, however, the relationship between the democratic and capitalist countries and the communist and authoritarian ussr fell apart. <\/p>\n fdr died two months after the yalta conference, leaving his vice president, harry truman, to negotiate the post-wwii world. before the ussr could be much help in the pacific theater, the united states dropped the atomic bomb on hiroshima and nagasaki in japan. <\/p>\n there are conflicting reasons for this decision. i\u2019ll explain three possible motives as described by the stanford history education group<\/a>.<\/p>\n reason #1: military necessity<\/strong><\/p>\n some historians believe that the intention was always to use the bomb, even though the war was quickly coming to an end. as stated in the us history textbook american vision<\/em>, \u201cpresident truman later wrote that he \u2018regarded the bomb as a military weapon and never had any doubts that it should be used.\u2019 his advisers had warned him to expect massive casualties if the united states invaded japan. truman believed it was his duty as president to use every weapon available to save american lives\u201d (p. 615). <\/p>\n reason #2: saving american lives<\/strong><\/p>\n other historians believe that an invasion of japan, even with the assistance of the ussr, would have resulted in the loss of many american lives. at the battle of okinawa, only a few weeks before the dropping of the bomb, 123,000 soldiers \u2013 japanese and american \u2013 died. many believed that the death toll would increase exponentially. <\/p>\n an estimated 135,000 civilians (non-military individuals) died in hiroshima immediately after the dropping of the bomb; the pre-bomb population was only 255,000. in nagasaki, an estimated 64,000 civilians died immediately; the pre-bomb population was 195,000. <\/p>\n reason #3: stopping russia<\/strong><\/p>\n finally, some historians believe that the main reason for using the bomb was to give the ussr the impression that the united states would not tolerate unchecked aggression into asia. read the following source for an example of this position. <\/p>\n \u201c[james byrnes, one of truman\u2019s advisors on the bomb] was concerned about russia’s postwar behavior. russian troops had moved into hungary and romania, and byrnes thought it would be very difficult to persuade russia to withdraw her troops from these countries, that russia might be more manageable if impressed by american military might, and that a demonstration of the bomb might impress russia.\u201d in addition to defeating japan, byrnes wanted to keep the soviet union from expanding its influence in asia, and wanted to limit its influence in europe. manhattan project scientist leo szilard met with byrnes on may 28, 1945. leo szilard wrote about his meeting with byrnes in 1980.<\/p>\n for stalin\u2019s part, he did not keep his promise of offering free elections in eastern europe, and nowhere was that more apparent than in germany itself. in the potsdam conference<\/a> held in the summer of 1945 (after germany surrendered in europe, and before the bombs dropped in japan), the allies solidified an agreement they had made at yalta to various zones of occupation in germany.<\/p>\n at the end of world war ii, germany was divided into four zones. while the french, british and american cooperated, the soviet zone grew more isolated. one of the striking examples of the effect of these occupation zones<\/a> was in berlin, where west berlin (controlled by the united states and great britain) and east berlin (controlled by the soviets) had very different economies and political freedoms.<\/p>\nwhat was the yalta conference?<\/h2>\n
what did the big three agree to at the yalta conference?<\/h2>\n
\n
\n <\/li>\n
\n <\/li>\nwait, what does all of this have to do with the cold war?<\/h2>\n
why did the us drop the atomic bomb?<\/h2>\n
\nsource: leo szilard<\/strong><\/p>\ndid the ussr keep the promises they made at the yalta conference?<\/h2>\n
what is an example yalta conference apush question?<\/h2>\n