{"id":10374,"date":"2017-06-27t12:21:06","date_gmt":"2017-06-27t19:21:06","guid":{"rendered":"\/\/www.catharsisit.com\/hs\/?p=10374"},"modified":"2022-06-14t17:21:31","modified_gmt":"2022-06-15t00:21:31","slug":"navigation-acts-apush-topics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.catharsisit.com\/hs\/ap\/navigation-acts-apush-topics\/","title":{"rendered":"navigation acts: apush topics to study for test day"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
the navigation acts refer to a large body of various pieces of legislation enacted between 1651 and 1663 (although other acts that came under the purview of the \u201cnavigation acts\u201d passed much longer). keep reading for an overview for apush of what these acts meant for the colonial united states and the eventual founding of the nation.<\/p>\n
don\u2019t be fooled by the name; the navigation acts were primarily about trade and taxes, not directions.<\/p>\n
when you see this term referenced in your apush textbook, it is likely that you are learning about one (or all) of the following pieces of legislation:<\/p>\n
if you haven\u2019t read my previous post on mercantilism<\/a>, you should read it now. this helps explain the financial incentives great britain had to establish acts that regulated trade to such a high degree. and, if you haven\u2019t read my previous post on salutary neglect<\/a>, you should also read that now. because that helps make sense of the rest of the story.<\/p>\n there\u2019s always more to the story, my dear young scholar.<\/p>\n your textbook or apush course may have lumped the molasses act of 1733<\/a> in the larger navigation acts.<\/p>\n you may be surprised to find that the navigation acts were largely followed \u2013 that is, up until the molasses act. many colonists did not view themselves as separate from great britain, but rather, as british citizens abroad. their wealth and success in the british colonial project reflected well on the mother country; overwhelmingly, these individuals did not see themselves as revolutionary at all.<\/p>\n that is until the colonists began to view the british government as crossing a line. the molasses act of 1733 began to shape what that line would become.<\/p>\n in this act, the british levied heavy fines and penalties (called duties) against sugar from the french west indies (why? again, mercantilism). this made the formerly cheaper sugar from these islands much more expensive, forcing the hand of colonists: they had to buy from the british west indies sugar plantations.<\/p>\n as was the case when trade of just about any valuable good was restricted (think about the failed prohibition policy of the early 20th century), the de facto prohibition of cheap sugar caused a rampant black market of sugar trade to develop. the colonists were making their displeasure heard through \u201ccreatively\u201d working around the restrictions of the molasses act. originally set to expire in 1763, the molasses act was renewed in 1764 as the sugar act; this action infuriated the colonists and was a major impetus for the american revolution (why? salutary neglect, for starters).<\/p>\nwait\u2026there\u2019s more to the story?<\/h2>\n